user preferences

Report from Autumn 2005 WSM national conference

category ireland / britain | anarchist movement | feature author Friday November 11, 2005 22:49author by Andrew - WSM Report this post to the editors

The Workers Solidarity Meeting held its Autumn 2005 conference over the October bank holiday weekend. National conference is the decision making body of the WSM – it does everything from agree the collective political positions of the WSM to decide what mechanisms we use to make decisions. With this feature we include links to all the positions paper that came out of the conference.

This conference took place in a period of growth in the libertarian movement across Ireland. As part of this the WSM has increased in size over the last couple of years which meant that at this conference we needed to deal with both structural issues arising from this growth and the political direction of the organization.

The conference was held in Dublin and well attended - around 80% of WSM members made at least some of the conference. Some 70 motions covering eight different areas were discussed and voted on over the weekend. Financial and other reports were also presented and questioned/discussed by the membership. The conference ended with elections to the various commissions and editorial groups within the WSM

The full amended WSM position papers are linked to with the summaries below

Trade unions

Eight motions addressed WSM work in the unions and the changing nature of the Irish workplace in particular in relation to the increasing percentage of women and /or migrant workers. The focus of debate was around the Independent Workers Union (IWU)which was singled out as particularly worthy our support because of its work to recruit and organise low paid workers and its anti-partnership stance. After some debate we decided to encourage all of our members to become either full or associate IWU members.
[Read the entire The Trade Unions position paper]

The Partition of Ireland

The debate around the WSM’s position with regards to partition continued at this conference with some 24 individual motions and some 7 amendments to these motions. Individual changes are too many to list here but as a result of this session this position paper will again see very substantial modifications. The paper continues to move towards addressing all aspects of partition rather than just concentrating on the provisional IRA and other republican campaigns against the border. Debate focused around the effects of partition on the south - in particular the reasons for the decline in the percentage of the Protestant population and the true level of state influence and power held by the Catholic Church. The concept of partition as a compromise for some unionists as well as Irish nationalists was also debated (as was much else!).
[Read the entire The partition of Ireland

WSM constitution

The WSM constitution describes how the organisation functions and in particular how it makes decisions. As the WSM has expended in the last couple of years from one branch and a couple of members in Cork to three branches we have learned that what we had worked out in theory in terms of operating as a national organisation, did not work so well in practice. This session concentrated on how we would make decisions between conferences. In total there were 14 motions and 7 amendments to these motions. On the day itself we suspended standing orders for this session in order to allow additional amendments to be put forward as the discussion progressed.

Because internal democracy is so fundamental to anarchism this session was both painstaking and protracted with a lot of intense debate on what would look like minor issues to those with less concern for democratic decision making. After a three-hour debate we have emerged with what should prove to be a workable inter conference national decision-making structure complete with a new name, the ‘Delegate Council’.

One interesting aspect of this debate was the need to deal with situations where there were up to four different amendments to the same motions. We had to resolve how we would decide on which of these four were accepted. After some discussion we went for a system of voting where a hand vote would be taken and the proposal with the lowest number of votes eliminated. The vote would then be retaken and the proposal with the lowest number of votes again eliminated. Once agreed this turned out to be quite a rapid way of conducting a multiway vote so that that the result reflected the views of the majority.
[Read the entire WSM Constitution position paper]

International perspectives

In this session our two old papers ‘International Perspectives’ and ‘Building an anarchist International’ were merged into a single paper. Changes made reflected the increasing role the internet plays in international relations between anarchist groups. We also formalized our agreement with the anakismo.net project which included agreeing a delegate to the anarkismo.net editorial list and a annual donation to the project.
[Read the entire Building an anarchist international position paper]

Our Perspectives

There were eight motions on the WSM ‘Our perspectives’ paper. These reaffirmed our commitment to working in mass organizations, set up a group to organize a national speaking tour outside of Dublin and Cork and re-affirmed our commitment to helping to build a broad libertarian movement. We also debated ways to improve the level of political debate within the organization and the agreeing of a collective approach to struggles. A major decision was to retire our position paper ‘State capitalism in Russia’ which was felt to be outdated and largely irrelevant outside of Leninist debates. A working group has been set up to discuss the Russian revolution and its aftermath and to prepare a new draft paper for a future conference.[Read the entire Our Perspectives position paper]

Other areas

Other areas there were motions on include WSM administration, practice and publications. This would mostly only be of interest to members although they do include setting up a group to get drafts for a new logo.

[Read the entire WSM Administration position paper]
[Read the entire WSM Practice position paper]
[Read the entire Publications position paper]


The next WSM conference will happen around March of 2006. For more about the web see our website http://www.struggle.ws/wsm

author by hmm..publication date Tue Nov 01, 2005 05:06Report this post to the editors

Is russia really worth having a working group on? Why not have one on something more interesting and relevent.

Leave the dead hand of the past behind you.

author by mitchpublication date Tue Nov 01, 2005 08:19author email wsany at hotmail dot comReport this post to the editors

Interesting, particularly the position on the IWU. I look forward to reading the reolutions on this perspective.

Point of information, did the IWU start out as a transport union alterantive? Or have they always been a "general" indpendent?

author by Andrew - WSM (personal cap)publication date Tue Nov 01, 2005 19:55Report this post to the editors

To "hmm"

It's worth remembering that the Russian revolution involved millions of people in the second greatest self-management experiment the world has ever seen. It overthrew a brutal undemocratic regime. But instead of leading to freedom it lead to the gulag, famine and a new scientific dicatorship that lasted 80 years.

It also warped the entire global revolutionary movement so that almost everywhere the diverse range of groups became monolithic re-creators of a party line coming from Moscow. This doomed socialism to failure in the 20th century as the 'highpoints' were nealy all attempts to reproduce a misunderstanding of what happened in Russia.

This is the sort of history you either learn from or repeat.

To Mitch

Actually the parent union is also a general union (thats what the G is for).

The IWU arose out of a row between the British TGWU and the leadership of its Irish section, the ATGWU. The IWU was essentially set up as an escape boat if the Irish leadership of the ATGWU was expelled. An article from that time is at http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/ws/2002/ws69/union.html - the IWU was also mentioned in the interview NEFAC did with some WSM members which is at http://nefac.net/node/365

However this didn't happen and instead those who had committed to the IWU have kept it going. Their web page at http://www.union.ie/ summarises why "A group of Irish Trade Unionist were convinced that the Trade Union Movement in its present structure in Ireland has lost its way, and had become nothing more than an arm of the state and management. Its function has become more to control workers rather than advance their interests. People had worked for many years to attempt to reform the movement from within, and apart from some minor victories, their efforts have been continuously stifled by the powers that be within the present Trade Union hierarchy. It is now fair to conclude that the existing Trade Unions cannot be reformed for the advance of the Irish worker. Hence the formation of the I.W.U."

The main strength of the IWU is in Cork where some of our members have been involved from the start but in Dublin as well as a couple of our members being IWU members we have been working with this in the 'Stand up for your rights' campaign.

Other relevant articles
http://struggle.ws/wsm/ws/2005/84/music.html
http://struggle.ws/wsm/ws/2004/83/iwubus.html
http://www.workersolidarity.org/WSMreply.html

author by Terry - IRSPpublication date Sun Nov 13, 2005 16:15Report this post to the editors

I'm pleased to read in one of their very long position documents that the WSM have ceased using the phrase 'Workers Republic' and are now for 'an anarchist Ireland'.

It brings more clarity to their politics and goals, and is more principled anyway than using the legacy of Connolly He was one of the greatest Marxists to ever live, not an anarchist, and its the IRSP who follow in his legacy, not the WSM.

author by spittyspitty two shoes - anarcho independentpublication date Mon Nov 14, 2005 04:54Report this post to the editors

Sure almost everyone on the left claims to follow Connolly. Go to the 'official' Mayday celebrations in Liberty hall and every bureaucrat there will thump their heart and claim to 'stand in the tradition of Connolly and Larkin'. Doesn't make it true though.

BTW what particular part of the IRSP's / INLA's activities do you think would make Connolly the proudest? 'Taxing' drug dealers, being infiltrated and controlled by the British security forces, running protection rackets, feuding or the inherently braindead campaign to free Dessie O'Hare? (Braindead because every time Dessie gets released another internal feud kicks off!)

author by Joe - WSM (personal cap)publication date Tue Nov 15, 2005 19:01Report this post to the editors

I often feel sorry for Connolly as his body is fought over by so Irish political parties from Fianna Fail to the IRSP to the Socialist Party.

Personally I don't think any of these follow in his legacy - the politics and tactics he stood for were of a particular time - the time of revolutionary syndicalism. Revolutionary syndicalism was dead as a mass movement by the late 1920's (the IWW in the USA were the last to succum and they still claim a membership of 1100 or so today).

In today's terms it would be more accurate to see the 'workers republic' slogan as a legacy of revolutionary syndicalism rather than the sort of marxist leninism put forward by the IRSP. The vast majority of those who used in the slogan in Ireland between 1907 and 1920 would have seen themselves as syndicalists (of the One Big Union type). In Ireland until around 1923 it was normally found as a matched pair with "the co-operative commonwealth' it was only after this as the Irish left was 'leninised' that this syndicalist deviation was lost.

Connolly of course was a syndicalist as well as being a Marxist. An article which explores that side of his legacy can be found at

Related Link: http://www.anarkismo.net/newswire.php?story_id=663
author by Xavierpublication date Wed Jan 18, 2006 09:13Report this post to the editors

I am interested to know anarchist thinking in regard to crime and rehabilitation/ restoration of justice.

author by Andrew - WSMpublication date Wed Jan 18, 2006 17:17Report this post to the editors

We do not have a position paper on these questions - however we have written many articles which you will find at http://struggle.ws/wsm/crime.html

author by Xavierpublication date Wed Jan 18, 2006 19:21Report this post to the editors

I found the restorative justice concept of particular interest.

Number of comments per page
  
 
This page can be viewed in
English Italiano Deutsch
E

Latest News

Ireland / Britain | Anarchist movement | en

Tue 21 May, 03:14

browse text browse image

freedom_1.jpg imageSolidarity with "Freedom" 02:49 Tue 05 Feb by Relations internationales de la CGA 0 comments

ls2.gif imageStatement from Liberty & Solidarity 7th Conference 19:01 Thu 27 Sep by Liberty & Solidarity 1 comments

bookfairflyerbanner190w.gif imageHundreds expected to attend Dublin Anarchist Bookfair 15:09 Fri 18 May by Costas Avramidis 0 comments

workers127.jpg imageWorkers Solidarity 127 15:23 Tue 15 May by Costas Avramidis 0 comments

cact.jpg imageFormation of a new Anarchist Communist project in the UK 18:25 Wed 02 May by Collective Action 1 comments

derry.jpg imageBlack Flag of Anarchism flies over Free Derry - John McGuffin & a history of Free Derry corner 15:12 Tue 01 May by WSM-Derry 0 comments

bloodysundayanarchistposter.jpg imageBloody Sunday 40 Years On – March For Justice - press release 18:46 Thu 26 Jan by WSM 0 comments

textThe History of Belfast anarchism 23:55 Fri 09 Sep by Sean Matthews 0 comments

textSolidarity Books (Cork) is up and running! 23:13 Mon 21 Dec by Cork WSM 0 comments

dsc01922.jpg imageSuccessful anarchist event in Belfast 22:57 Sat 25 Jul by Workers Solidarity Movement 0 comments

more >>
© 2005-2013 Anarkismo.net. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Anarkismo.net. [ Disclaimer | Privacy ]