Other Press
|
Recent articles by Andrew
Resistance bulletin reaches issue 150 after 15 years Apr 12 13 Solidarity with "Freedom" Feb 05 13 Solidarité avec "Freedom" Feb 05 13 Report from Autumn 2005 WSM national conference ireland / britain |
anarchist movement |
feature
Friday November 11, 2005 22:49 by Andrew - WSM
![]()
This conference took place in a period of growth in the libertarian movement across Ireland. As part of this the WSM has increased in size over the last couple of years which meant that at this conference we needed to deal with both structural issues arising from this growth and the political direction of the organization. The conference was held in Dublin and well attended - around 80% of WSM members made at least some of the conference. Some 70 motions covering eight different areas were discussed and voted on over the weekend. Financial and other reports were also presented and questioned/discussed by the membership. The conference ended with elections to the various commissions and editorial groups within the WSM The full amended WSM position papers are linked to with the summaries below Trade unionsEight motions addressed WSM work in the unions and the changing
nature of the Irish workplace in particular in relation to the
increasing percentage of women and /or migrant workers. The focus of
debate was around the Independent Workers Union (IWU)which was
singled out as particularly worthy our support because of its work to
recruit and organise low paid workers and its anti-partnership
stance. After some debate we decided to encourage all of our members
to become either full or associate IWU members. The Partition of IrelandThe debate around the WSM’s position with regards to partition
continued at this conference with some 24 individual motions and some
7 amendments to these motions. Individual changes are too many to
list here but as a result of this session this position paper will
again see very substantial modifications. The paper continues to move
towards addressing all aspects of partition rather than just
concentrating on the provisional IRA and other republican campaigns
against the border. Debate focused around the effects of partition on
the south - in particular the reasons for the decline in the
percentage of the Protestant population and the true level of state
influence and power held by the Catholic Church. The concept of
partition as a compromise for some unionists as well as Irish
nationalists was also debated (as was much else!). WSM constitutionThe WSM constitution describes how the organisation functions and
in particular how it makes decisions. As the WSM has expended in the
last couple of years from one branch and a couple of members in Cork
to three branches we have learned that what we had worked out in
theory in terms of operating as a national organisation, did not work
so well in practice. This session concentrated on how we would make
decisions between conferences. In total there were 14 motions and 7
amendments to these motions. On the day itself we suspended standing
orders for this session in order to allow additional amendments to be
put forward as the discussion progressed. International perspectivesIn this session our two old papers ‘International Perspectives’
and ‘Building an anarchist International’ were merged into a single
paper. Changes made reflected the increasing role the internet plays
in international relations between anarchist groups. We also
formalized our agreement with the anakismo.net project which included
agreeing a delegate to the anarkismo.net editorial list and a annual
donation to the project. Our PerspectivesThere were eight motions on the WSM ‘Our perspectives’ paper.
These reaffirmed our commitment to working in mass organizations, set
up a group to organize a national speaking tour outside of Dublin and
Cork and re-affirmed our commitment to helping to build a broad
libertarian movement. We also debated ways to improve the level of
political debate within the organization and the agreeing of a
collective approach to struggles. A major decision was to retire our
position paper ‘State capitalism in Russia’ which was felt to be
outdated and largely irrelevant outside of Leninist debates. A
working group has been set up to discuss the Russian revolution and
its aftermath and to prepare a new draft paper for a future
conference.[Read the entire
Our
Perspectives position paper] Other areasOther areas there were motions on include WSM administration, practice and publications. This would mostly only be of interest to members although they do include setting up a group to get drafts for a new logo. [Read the entire
WSM
Administration position paper]
|
Front pageChile: El Frente de Estudiantes Libertarios (FEL) cumple 10 años Clasa muncitoare din România: țintă sigură în bătaia puştii capitalismului 10 years of the Balkan Anarchist Bookfair i-ANC Ikhumula Isifihla Buso Sayo! Kubulewe Abasebenzi! Mayday. Remembering the past, fighting for tomorrow Brazilian anarchism interview on the Crisis, World Cup, Especifismo La revolución bolivariana en la encrucijada Mobilizações contra o Aumento do Transporte em Porto Alegre, Brasil La conquête du pain, un enjeu d'actualité ! Habemus Papam: Aquel que esté libre de pecado que arroje la primera piedra 8 marzo: Dopo gli anni delle veline, gli anni della vittima Reflexiones libertarias sobre la muerte de Hugo Chávez [Chile] Definitivamente, no somos iguales ante la ley Avance de los libertarios en la construcción de una alternativa sindical en Uruguay. Estado español: cuando cruje el edificio XIe Congrès d’Alternative Libertaire: La ville rose en rouge et noir بيان الحركة الاشتراكية التحررية عن المعت Mali : Areva vaut bien une guerre Anarchists and the French-Algerian War Il 2012: un anno di attacchi senza precedenti alle classi lavoratrici Las disputas en el bloque dominante argentino de cara al 2013 Conflicto en la Araucanía: entre el racismo y el terrorismo de Estado Latest NewsIreland / Britain | Anarchist movement | en Tue 21 May, 03:14
Opinion and Analysis
Press Releases
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (9 of 9)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Is russia really worth having a working group on? Why not have one on something more interesting and relevent.
Leave the dead hand of the past behind you.
Interesting, particularly the position on the IWU. I look forward to reading the reolutions on this perspective.
Point of information, did the IWU start out as a transport union alterantive? Or have they always been a "general" indpendent?
To "hmm"
It's worth remembering that the Russian revolution involved millions of people in the second greatest self-management experiment the world has ever seen. It overthrew a brutal undemocratic regime. But instead of leading to freedom it lead to the gulag, famine and a new scientific dicatorship that lasted 80 years.
It also warped the entire global revolutionary movement so that almost everywhere the diverse range of groups became monolithic re-creators of a party line coming from Moscow. This doomed socialism to failure in the 20th century as the 'highpoints' were nealy all attempts to reproduce a misunderstanding of what happened in Russia.
This is the sort of history you either learn from or repeat.
To Mitch
Actually the parent union is also a general union (thats what the G is for).
The IWU arose out of a row between the British TGWU and the leadership of its Irish section, the ATGWU. The IWU was essentially set up as an escape boat if the Irish leadership of the ATGWU was expelled. An article from that time is at http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/ws/2002/ws69/union.html - the IWU was also mentioned in the interview NEFAC did with some WSM members which is at http://nefac.net/node/365
However this didn't happen and instead those who had committed to the IWU have kept it going. Their web page at http://www.union.ie/ summarises why "A group of Irish Trade Unionist were convinced that the Trade Union Movement in its present structure in Ireland has lost its way, and had become nothing more than an arm of the state and management. Its function has become more to control workers rather than advance their interests. People had worked for many years to attempt to reform the movement from within, and apart from some minor victories, their efforts have been continuously stifled by the powers that be within the present Trade Union hierarchy. It is now fair to conclude that the existing Trade Unions cannot be reformed for the advance of the Irish worker. Hence the formation of the I.W.U."
The main strength of the IWU is in Cork where some of our members have been involved from the start but in Dublin as well as a couple of our members being IWU members we have been working with this in the 'Stand up for your rights' campaign.
Other relevant articles
http://struggle.ws/wsm/ws/2005/84/music.html
http://struggle.ws/wsm/ws/2004/83/iwubus.html
http://www.workersolidarity.org/WSMreply.html
I'm pleased to read in one of their very long position documents that the WSM have ceased using the phrase 'Workers Republic' and are now for 'an anarchist Ireland'.
It brings more clarity to their politics and goals, and is more principled anyway than using the legacy of Connolly He was one of the greatest Marxists to ever live, not an anarchist, and its the IRSP who follow in his legacy, not the WSM.
Sure almost everyone on the left claims to follow Connolly. Go to the 'official' Mayday celebrations in Liberty hall and every bureaucrat there will thump their heart and claim to 'stand in the tradition of Connolly and Larkin'. Doesn't make it true though.
BTW what particular part of the IRSP's / INLA's activities do you think would make Connolly the proudest? 'Taxing' drug dealers, being infiltrated and controlled by the British security forces, running protection rackets, feuding or the inherently braindead campaign to free Dessie O'Hare? (Braindead because every time Dessie gets released another internal feud kicks off!)
I often feel sorry for Connolly as his body is fought over by so Irish political parties from Fianna Fail to the IRSP to the Socialist Party.
Personally I don't think any of these follow in his legacy - the politics and tactics he stood for were of a particular time - the time of revolutionary syndicalism. Revolutionary syndicalism was dead as a mass movement by the late 1920's (the IWW in the USA were the last to succum and they still claim a membership of 1100 or so today).
In today's terms it would be more accurate to see the 'workers republic' slogan as a legacy of revolutionary syndicalism rather than the sort of marxist leninism put forward by the IRSP. The vast majority of those who used in the slogan in Ireland between 1907 and 1920 would have seen themselves as syndicalists (of the One Big Union type). In Ireland until around 1923 it was normally found as a matched pair with "the co-operative commonwealth' it was only after this as the Irish left was 'leninised' that this syndicalist deviation was lost.
Connolly of course was a syndicalist as well as being a Marxist. An article which explores that side of his legacy can be found at
I am interested to know anarchist thinking in regard to crime and rehabilitation/ restoration of justice.
We do not have a position paper on these questions - however we have written many articles which you will find at http://struggle.ws/wsm/crime.html
I found the restorative justice concept of particular interest.