user preferences

New Events

Brazil/Guyana/Suriname/FGuiana

no event posted in the last week

Social Classes and Bureaucracy in Bakunin

category brazil/guyana/suriname/fguiana | anarchist movement | opinion / analysis author Friday November 04, 2016 01:34author by Felipe Corrêa Report this post to the editors

This article – almost fully extracted from my book Teoria Bakuniniana do Estado [Bakuninian Theory of the State] – aims to realize a brief discussion on the theory of social classes and bureaucracy elaborated by Mikhail Bakunin in his anarchist period. What are the criteria that define the social classes? Which are the social classes? Are there dominant and oppressed classes? How can class struggle be defined? What is bureaucracy? How does it relate to other social strata? These are some of the questions the text tries to answer.

bak5.jpg

“The state has always been the patrimony of some privileged class:
a priestly class, an aristocratic class, a bourgeois class,
a bureaucratic class in the end”.

Mikhail Bakunin[1]



This article – almost fully extracted from my book Teoria Bakuniniana do Estado [Bakuninian Theory of the State][2] – aims to realize a brief discussion on the theory of social classes and bureaucracy elaborated by Mikhail Bakunin in his anarchist period.

What are the criteria that define the social classes? Which are the social classes? Are there dominant and oppressed classes? How can class struggle be defined? What is bureaucracy? How does it relate to other social strata? These are some of the questions the text tries to answer.


Social classes and class struggle

For Bakunin, social classes are fundamental features of capitalist society and they are constituted from social production and reproduction.

“In human society [...] the differences in classes is, still, very marked, and the whole world will know to distinguish the noble aristocracy from the financial aristocracy, the upper bourgeoisie from the petit bourgeoisie, and the latter from the proletariats of the factories and cities; in this way too, the big landowner from the farmer and the peasant who cultivates their land; the farmer from the simple proletarian of the countryside.”[3]

In this excerpt a few concrete social classes are, more or less clearly, distinguished: nobility, landowners, bourgeoisie, proletariat (of the city and the countryside) and peasantry. In other texts, the author points out the existence of yet other concrete social classes: “priestly class”, “bureaucratic class” and “tattered proletariat”.[4] Thus, in addition to the classes listed above, there are at least three others: the clergy, bureaucracy and the marginalized in general, or “lumpenproletariat”, according to Marxian terminology.

In discussing the criteria for the definition of the social classes, Bakunin points to the notions of domination and privilege as the primary foundation. Thanks to the relevance of the economic sphere in the social dynamic, economic privileges and domination constitute key criteria in this conceptualization: “exclusive ownership of the land”, a privilege of the nobility of its time, and “monopoly of capital and both industrial and commercial companies”, privilege of the bourgeoisie of its time, constitute the bases of economic domination both of the owners of the means of production and distribution in relation to the wage workers of the city and countryside, as well as of the landowners in relation to peasant farmers or even smallholders; the difference between rich and poor, based on the ownership of capital, also implies another important economic privilege and contributes to class domination.

Ownership of the means of production, including the land, of distribution and of capital implies, according to the author, “the exploitation of the subjected labour, or forced by hunger, of the popular masses” and thus increases social inequality, making the rich get richer and the poor poorer.[5]

However, the economic criteria are not the only ones in this conceptualization. The bureaucracy, Bakunin continues, constitutes a “class of privileged [...] men” that has “solidarity with the interests of the state” and, because of this, devotes itself “body and soul to its prosperity and existence”, by means of the control of the state’s administration that it has and all that this implies. He also points out “the artificial and forced development of the stupidity of the masses”, privilege of the clergy of its time, based on the capacity that it has to promote a certain understanding of the world.[6] For him, another criteria capable of strengthening this vision of reality is the “difference in instruction and education”, that can support class domination, in which “a mass of slaves” is subjugated by “a small number of rulers”.[7]

Thus, in addition to economic criteria the author points out other criteria that are relevant to his definition of social classes: ownership of the means of administration, control and coercion, as well as ownership of the means of the production of knowledge.

In short, it can be said that social classes are defined starting with the category of domination and are forged in a triadic relationship, covering economics, politics and culture; they provide, therefore, a social stratification which demonstrates different privileges.

In the economic sphere, the ownership of the means of production, including land, of distribution and of capital; in the political sphere, the ownership of the means of administration, control and coercion; in the cultural sphere, the ownership of the means of the production of knowledge. In general terms, economic privileges imply exploitation of labour, political privileges imply political-bureaucratic domination and physical coercion and cultural privileges imply cultural alienation.

Taking into account the nineteenth century analyzed by Bakunin, the ruling classes – or “privileged classes”/”upper classes”, as he generally calls them – included: the nobility/landlords (owners of the lands), the bourgeoisie (owners of the means of production and of capital), bureaucracy (owners of the means of administration, coercion and control) and clergy (owners of the means of knowledge production). The dominated classes encompassed: proletariat of town and country (salaried workers), peasants (farmers or smallholders) and marginalized (the unemployed, beggars, destitute, illiterate, thieves etc.). Obviously there are fractions of classes and “grey areas” that are placed between these large categories.

The class struggle manifests itself in the particular social relations between different agents according to their position in the social structure: workers and bosses, farmers and landowners etc. However, its manifestation on a larger scale involves the general social relations, shaped by two broad groups of dominators and dominated, which extrapolate the social structure and also involve the interests and the position taken in the conflict.

From a particular concrete historic-conjunctural universe, of nineteenth-century Europe, Bakunin establishes a theoretical model – and therefore, more abstract and general –, which proposes to reduce the set of concrete social classes of his time to two broad groups:

“All these different social and political existences are today reduced to two main categories, directly opposed one to the other, and natural enemies of one another: the political classes, comprised of all the privileged, both of land as well as capital, or even just of bourgeois education, and the working classes disinherited both of capital and of land, and deprived of any education and any instruction.”[8]

Although this quote does not include all the criteria used by the author in their definition of classes, it shows that the concrete social classes in a given context can be reduced to two groups, which are permanently in conflict. They are here called the “political classes” and “working classes”, but they could be named, more aptly, the dominant classes and the dominated classes, oppressor classes and oppressed classes, superior classes and inferior classes, privileged classes and dispossessed classes.

The basis of this reduction is not the centrality of these categories in a given historical moment nor its perspective for future evolution, but the class interests and the role played by these classes in the process of the class struggle more generally. Such permanent conflict founded on the structural position of the agents, but potentiated by their consciousness and their actions, constitutes the Bakuninian concept of class struggle.

The class struggle is characterized, in this more general way, by the contradiction of these two groups motivated by determined interests that, although they have in the structural position of the agents a greater influence of determination, they are not derived mechanically from them and may be influenced by other factors, strengthening or cooling the process of struggle.


Bureaucracy as a social class

According to Bakunin’s thought, the bureaucracy is a social class, which he conceptualizes and explains how it arises, structures itself and relates to other classes. For the author, as seen, the political criteria are incorporated into the very definition of social classes and in his way of achieving social stratification.

As sustained by Gaston Leval, for Bakunin, the political domination of the state implies a class domination, not only through the direct relation with the dominant classes in general, but because it has the structural capacity itself to reproduce another dominant class: the bureaucracy.[9]

The bureaucracy is a social class with a political base consisting of a privileged minority that has ownership of the means of administration, control and coercion of the state. It is, as shown by Bakunin, “a body of politicians, privileged in fact, not in right, which, dedicated exclusively to the conduct of a country’s public affairs, ends up forming a kind of aristocracy or political oligarchy”.[10] Their privileges – ownership of power, the monopoly of political decision-making – are always enjoyed by a minority, since the majority do not fit in the state; they are important aspects of the bureaucracy and form the basis of the domination exercised by it.

René Berthier adds, taking Bakunin's analysis of the German bureaucracy as a basis:

“The bureaucracy is in first place an emanation of the state, its social base, the layer that sustains the illusion of the rationality and necessity of the state. It is what makes the state a reality, an effective power that gives it content. The bureaucracy embodies the idea of the state at the same time as it is its apparatus. [...] The bureaucracy ends up being confused with the state, with its cascading hierarchies constituting what Bakunin called the ‘priestly body of the state’.”[11]

As the modern state emerges and is strengthened, it conforms to the bureaucracy that, even though coming from different classes, gives meaning and content to the state itself, and ends up defending the interests of the state itself, establishing its own interests as a separate class, justified by the need for rational management of policy. Ownership of the means of administration, control and coercion of the state, beyond the political benefits relative to power, also imply economic advantages for the members of the bureaucracy, which can be more or less temporary, constituted through hereditary means, exclusive recruitment from certain social strata or “democratically” elected from among the population.

Berthier continues, highlighting that “the bureaucracy may tend to be autonomous from the state, just as the state tends to become autonomous in relation to society”.[12] This tendency to autonomization of the bureaucracy is always forged in a permanent tension with the dynamics of relations between state and civil society in general, and between the state and social classes in particular. From a structural perspective, there is a constant tension, more latent or manifest, between the class origin of the members of the bureaucracy and the bureaucratic class itself. Their interests, although they do not originate mechanically from their structural position, are certainly influenced by it and, in the process, the tension between class origin and bureaucracy shows itself to be relevant. Independent of this conflict, the bureaucratic class tends to develop its own interests, even though seeking to reconcile them with others.

In the historical analysis that he performs of the state, Bakunin points out that it is established as an instrument of class domination and as a result of class conflict. In this process, it forms a determined modus operandi that implies generalized domination and with which the bureaucracy is directly linked.[13]

When people begin to administer the state, “the inflexible logic of its condition and other imperative reasons dictated by certain considerations of hierarchical order and political interests overlap”, since “the demands of a certain situation are always stronger than feelings, ulterior motives and good intentions”. Over time, the state structure is strengthened and becomes able to give continuity to relations of domination since they are able, to a large extent, to shape the interests of their members and conform them in a distinct social class. The structure of the state was created to ensure class domination and thus remains, independent of the will of the members of the bureaucracy, regardless of their class origin. “Once integrated into this class [bureaucratic class]”, these agents “become, in one way or another, enemies of the people”.[14] Even if they don’t want to, the agents of the bureaucracy are condemned to promoting domination since they embody an essentially dominating structure.

The bureaucracy has a relatively autonomous existence in relation to the other dominating classes. The defense of the interests of the dominant classes being the state’s reason for being, as Jean-Cristophe Angaut points out, the operation of the bureaucracy can occur in different ways, in its relationship with the other dominating classes:

“Firstly, the state defends the interests of one of the three socially dominant classes (landed nobility, bourgeoisie or clergy) excluding those from the rest of society: depending on the case, the state will take the form of a feudal monarchy, a censitary constitutional regime or a theocracy. In the second case, which seems the most common, or even the most decisive for the formation of the state, the three ruling classes find themselves united against the people they exploit. Without it being possible to know whether there is a link with this predominant characteristic of the union of the privileged against the exploited, Bakunin says, then, that to the triple social exploitation is added an exploitation by the state itself, an exploitation that it qualifies politically and that can, at certain times, come into contradiction with the three other forms of exploitation (feudal, capitalist and religious), the point of the state, very accidentally, takes up the defense of the exploited. But, again, it is the union of the interests of the dominant that seems to prevail, such that the specific class that has given rise to the statist phenomenon does not delay in uniting with the other three to ensure social exploitation.”[15]

Seeking to generalize the historic cases evaluated by Bakunin in his time and establishing a conceptual standardization in relation to what was discussed, it is possible to say that, for him, the bureaucracy can relate to the other dominating classes in two ways. One, less frequent, when it simply defends the interests of one of them, as in the cases posed and, also, in the case of the bourgeois state. Another, more frequent, when the bureaucracy is added to them to establish a concerted domination over the oppressed classes in general and that has not only an economic or political, but social basis, involving all the types of previously discussed domination.

Another relevant aspect is that the author recognizes that, in its dynamics, it sometimes occurs that the state defends the interests of the dispossessed in relation to the privileged: there are periods in which “the government becomes even more hostile to the privileged classes than to the people”. Its “survival instinct” ends up forcing it, in some cases, to contradict the logic of class domination; even though, “these periods do not last long, since the government, whatever it is, cannot live without classes and these without the government.”[16]

According to Angaut’s explanation, this occurs in some circumstances when the bureaucracy, causing the state to mediate class conflicts, undermines the interests of the other dominating classes in the name of the long-term guarantee of the continuity of class domination. This is not established by an interest of the state in defending the dominated classes, but by the need to ensure the functioning of the system.[17] For this reason, in determined situations the state acts against the interests of the dominant classes, be it against all of these classes, one of them or some of its members in particular.


* Translation: Jonathan Payn


NOTES

1. BAKUNIN, Mikhail [1869]. “Aux Compagnons de l’Association Internationale des Travailleurs du Locle et de la Chaux-de-Fonds. Article 4.” In: Oeuvres Complètes, IISH, Amsterdam, 2000.

2. CORRÊA, Felipe. Teoria Bakuniniana do Estado. São Paulo: Intermezzo/Imaginário, 2014, pp. 101-110.

3. BAKUNIN, Mikhail [1867-1868]. Federalismo, Socialismo e Antiteologismo. São Paulo: Cortez, 1988, pp. 15-16. [“Federalism, Socialism, Anti-Theologism”]

4. BAKUNIN, Mikhail [1869]. “Aux Compagnons...” Op. Cit.; BAKUNIN, Mikhail [1873]. Estatismo e Anarquia. São Paulo: Imaginário, 2003, pp. 79, 30. [“Statism and Anarchy”]

5. In this text, domination is a central category that includes, among other sub-categories, the economic exploitation. (Cf. Errandonea, 1989)

6. BAKUNIN, Mikhail [1868]. “La Russie: la question révolutionnaire dans les pays russes et en Pologne.” In: Oeuvres Complètes, IISH, Amsterdam, 2000.

7. Ibid.

8. BAKUNIN, Mikhail [1869]. Instrução Integral. São Paulo: Imaginário, 2003, p. 59. [“Integral Education”]

9. BAKUNIN, Mikhail [1867-1868]. Federalismo, Socialismo... Op. Cit. p. 16.

10. LEVAL, Gaston. “Bakunin e o Estado Marxista”. In: Alexandre Skirda et alii. Os Anarquistas Julgam Marx. São Paulo: Imaginário, 2001.

11. BAKUNIN, Mikhail [1871]. Deus e o Estado. São Paulo: Imaginário, 2000, p. 36. [“God and the State”]

12. BERTHIER, René. “Elementos de uma Análise Bakuniniana da Burocracia”. In: BERTHIER, René; VILAIN, Éric. Marxismo e Anarquismo. São Paulo: Imaginário, 2011, p. 72.

13. Ibid.

14. BAKUNIN, Mikhail [1871]. “Três Conferências Feitas aos Operários do Vale de Saint-Imier.” In: O Princípio do Estado e Outros Ensaios. São Paulo: Hedra, 2008.

15. BAKUNIN, Mikhail [1873]. Estatismo e Anarquia. Op. Cit. p. 77.

16. ANGAUT, Jean-Christophe. Liberté et Histoire chez Michel Bakounine (PHD thesis), 2 vols. Université Nancy 2, 2005, pp. 436-437.

17. BAKUNIN, Mikhail [1867]. “Essência da Religião”. In: Essência da Religião / O Patriotismo. São Paulo: Imaginário, 2009, p. 63.

18. ANGAUT, Jean-Christophe. Liberté et Histoire... Op. Cit., p. 437.


BIBLIOGRAPHY
ANGAUT, Jean-Christophe. Liberté et Histoire chez Michel Bakounine (PHD thesis), 2 vols. Université Nancy 2, 2005.
BAKUNIN, Mikhail [1867-1868]. Federalismo, Socialismo e Antiteologismo. São Paulo: Cortez, 1988.
_________________ [1868]. “La Russie: la question révolutionnaire dans les pays russes et en Pologne.” In: Oeuvres Complètes, IISH, Amsterdam, 2000.
_________________ [1869]. “Aux Compagnons de l’Association Internationale des Travailleurs du Locle et de la Chaux-de-Fonds. Article 4.” In: Oeuvres Complètes, IISH, Amsterdam, 2000.
_________________ [1871]. Deus e o Estado. São Paulo: Imaginário, 2000.
_________________ [1873]. Estatismo e Anarquia. São Paulo: Imaginário, 2003.
_________________ [1869]. Instrução Integral. São Paulo: Imaginário, 2003.
_________________ [1871]. “Três Conferências Feitas aos Operários do Vale de Saint-Imier.” In: O Princípio do Estado e Outros Ensaios. São Paulo: Hedra, 2008.
_________________ [1867]. “Essência da Religião”. In: Essência da Religião / O Patriotismo. São Paulo: Imaginário, 2009.
BERTHIER, René. “Elementos de uma Análise Bakuniniana da Burocracia”. In: BERTHIER, René; VILAIN, Éric. Marxismo e Anarquismo. São Paulo: Imaginário, 2011.
CORRÊA, Felipe. Teoria Bakuniniana do Estado. São Paulo: Intermezzo/Imaginário, 2014.
ERRANDONEA, Alfredo. Sociologia de la Dominación. Montevideu/Buenos Aires: Nordan/Tupac, 1989.
LEVAL, Gaston. “Bakunin e o Estado Marxista”. In: Alexandre Skirda et alii. Os Anarquistas Julgam Marx. São Paulo: Imaginário, 2001.

Related Link: http://ithanarquista.wordpress.com
This page can be viewed in
English Italiano Deutsch

Front page

Strike in Cachoeirinha

(Bielorrusia) ¡Libertad inmediata a nuestro compañero Mikola Dziadok!

DAF’ın Referandum Üzerine Birinci Bildirisi:

Cajamarca, Tolima: consulta popular y disputa por el territorio

Statement on the Schmidt Case and Proposed Commission of Inquiry

Aodhan Ó Ríordáin: Playing The Big Man in America

Nós anarquistas saudamos o 8 de março: dia internacional de luta e resistência das mulheres!

Özgürlüğümüz Mücadelemizdedir

IWD 2017: Celebrating a new revolution

Solidarité avec Théo et toutes les victimes des violences policières ! Non à la loi « Sécurité Publique » !

Solidaridad y Defensa de las Comunidades Frente al Avance del Paramilitarismo en el Cauca

A Conservative Threat Offers New Opportunities for Working Class Feminism

De las colectivizaciones al 15M: 80 años de lucha por la autogestión en España

False hope, broken promises: Obama’s belligerent legacy

Primer encuentro feminista Solidaridad – Federación Comunista Libertaria

Devrimci Anarşist Tutsak Umut Fırat Süvarioğulları Açlık Grevinin 39 Gününde

The Fall of Aleppo

Italia - Ricostruire opposizione sociale organizzata dal basso. Costruire un progetto collettivo per l’alternativa libertaria.

Recordando a César Roa, luchador de la caña

Prison Sentence to Managing Editor of Anarchist Meydan Newspaper in Turkey

Liberación de la Uma Kiwe, autonomía y territorio: una mirada libertaria para la comprensión de la lucha nasa

Misunderstanding syndicalism

American Anarchist and Wobbly killed by Turkey while fighting ISIS in Rojava

Devlet Tecavüzdür

Brazil/Guyana/Suriname/FGuiana | Anarchist movement | en

Fri 28 Apr, 14:27

browse text browse image

bandeira_farj_web.jpg imageZACF Greetings to the Federação Anarquista do Rio de Janeiro (FARJ) on its 10th Anniversary 23:00 Sun 08 Sep by Zabalaza Anarchist Communist Front 0 comments

Dear comrades of the FARJ, It is with great honour that we send greetings to you on your tenth anniversary (30th August 2013) and in commemorating ten years of militant commitment to the arduous task of building a counter-power that can advance towards libertarian socialism, to anarchy.

cabpeq.jpg imageThe organizations that make up the CAB 20:11 Wed 06 Jun by Coordenação Anarquista Brasileira 0 comments

Some information about the various organizations in the Brazilian Anarchist Coordination. [Português]

opinio_anarquista.jpeg imageMessage to the Founding Congress of the Brazilian Anarchist Co-ordination (CAB) 13:51 Mon 04 Jun by Federação Anarquista Gaúcha 0 comments

In the days of June, in Rio de Janeiro, organised anarchism in Brazil will experience its greatest contemporary historical event. The Anarchist Congress, that will bring together groups from about 10 states across the country in debates, agreements and resolutions to act with common principles and tactics on the Brazilian reality, has a very special significance. Our conviction, in a more than 10 year process, says that militant anarchism holds indispensable contributions to the struggles for anti-capitalist social change. The meeting of militant forces that embody the same concept of work in co-ordination is a fundamental step in the journey of building political organisation that doesn’t just start now. [Português]

rubro.jpg imageBrazil: Declaration by the 2nd Encounter of Especifista Anarchism in the Northeast 19:24 Thu 19 Apr by Organizações Anarquistas no Nordeste do Brasil 0 comments

A further step forward in the advancement of Especifista Anarchism in northeastern Brazil has been made. Meeting in Recife, we sought to further the debate on Especifism and the structuring of political groupings in our region, with a view to strengthening and consolidating our movement. [Português]

faoimagem.jpg imageReport on the Internal Education Seminar of the Fórum do Anarquismo Organizado - Southern Region 18:53 Thu 22 Mar by Fórum do Anarquismo Organizado 0 comments

An internal education seminar for the Forum of Organized Anarchism (FAO) was held in Florianopolis (Santa Caterina state) on 17-18 March 2012. [Português]

fao.jpg imageNew CABN branch in Joinville 00:08 Thu 01 Mar by Coletivo Anarquista Bandeira Negra 0 comments

On 11 February 2012, members of the Organização Dias de Luta from Joinville met with members of the Coletivo Anarquista Bandeira Negra (CABN) from Florianópolis with the aim of bringing the two organizations together. The discussions dealt with the existing affinity regarding especifist organized anarchism, active within the social struggles, and the need for programmatic and organizational strategy involving different cities in the state of Santa Catarina. [Português]

seminario_formacao_fao_sudeste.jpg image1st Internal Educational Seminar of the Fórum do Anarquismo Organizado - South-East Region 17:04 Tue 24 Jan by Fórum do Anarquismo Organizado 0 comments

Declaration by the 1st Internal Educational Seminar of the Fórum do Anarquismo Organizado - South-East Region, held in Rio de Janeiro on 21 and 22 January 2012. [Português]

Organização Anarquista Socialismo Libertário imageOASL - Change of Name and Entry into the FAO 16:03 Tue 03 May by Organização Anarquista Socialismo Libertário 0 comments

Change of Name and Entry into the FAO [Português]

Federação Anarquista de São Paulo imageFoundation of the Federação Anarquista de São Paulo (FASP) 16:34 Thu 26 Nov by Federação Anarquista de São Paulo 0 comments

The Federação Anarquista de São Paulo (FASP - Anarchist Federation of São Paulo) was founded on 18th November 2009! Though already in existence under the name Pro-FASP since early 2008, the organization was formally founded at an event last weekend that brought together FASP members together with delegates from the Federação Anarquista do Rio de Janeiro (FARJ). [Português] [Français][Italiano]

460_0___30_0_0_0_0_0_procao.jpg imagePresentation Letter of the Pró-Coletivo Anarquista Organizado de Joinville 23:43 Sat 03 Oct by Pró-CAO 0 comments

The present document is the first public document of Pró-CAO (Pró – Coletivo Anarquista Organizado / Pro – Organized Anarchist Collective) of Joinville, Santa Catarina, in which we will try to present our project for the construction of an organized anarchist policy with an ideologically revolutionary program.

more >>

imageThoughts on Commitment, Responsibility and Self-discipline Jan 24 by Federação Anarquista do Rio de Janeiro 0 comments

This article discusses the complicated questions of commitment, responsibility and self-discipline from the point of view of the Anarchist Federation of Rio de Janeiro. [Português] [Castellano]

imageBrazil: Elements For a Historical Reconstitution of Our Current Jan 10 by OASL / FARJ 1 comments

Ten years of the Forum of Organised Anarchism (Fórum do Anarquismo Organizado – FAO) were commemorated with the foundation of the Brazilian Anarchist Coordination (Coordenação Anarquista Brasileira – CAB), uniting organisations from nine states around especifista anarchism as well as others that are progressively approaching and deepening organisational ties with us. In this text, we present a first contribution, with a few elements for a historical reconstitution of our current, that is, anarchism of the especifista matrix, in Brazil. We hope that other contributions can help boost it or, possibly, correct the information presented here.

imageTowards a Libertarian Theory of Power - part 2 Jul 12 by Felipe Corrêa 0 comments

"Towards a Libertarian Theory of Power" is a series of elaborated reviews about books or articles by authors from the libertarian camp who discuss power. Its objective is to present a contemporary literature of authors who treat the theme in question and contribute elements for the elaboration of a libertarian theory of power, that could contribute to the elaboration of a method of analysis of reality and of strategies of libertarian basis, to be utilised by individuals and organisations. Originally published in Portuguese on the site Estratégia e Análise. [Português] [Part 1: Ibáñez and Libertarian Political Power]

imageSocial Anarchism & Organisation: Concentric Circles Aug 13 by Federação Anarquista do Rio de Janeiro 1 comments

The specific anarchist organisation uses, both for its internal and external functioning, the logic of what we call "concentric circles" - strongly inspired by the Bakuninist organisational model. The main reason that we adopt this logic of functioning is because, for us, the anarchist organisation needs to preserve different instances of action. These different instances should strengthen its work while at the same time allowing it to bring together prepared militants with a high level of commitment and approximating people sympathetic to the theory or practice of the organisation - who could be more or less prepared and more or less committed. In short, the concentric circles seek to resolve an important paradox: the anarchist organisation needs to be closed enough to have prepared, committed and politically aligned militants, and open enough to draw in new militants. [Italiano]

textThe Specific Organisation Jun 17 by Jaime Cubero 2 comments

This is an English translation of the text produced by Jaime Cubero in São Paulo, Brazil. It deals with the concept of individual and collective responsibility within the specific anarchist organisation.

more >>

imageMessage to the Founding Congress of the Brazilian Anarchist Co-ordination (CAB) Jun 04 FAG 0 comments

In the days of June, in Rio de Janeiro, organised anarchism in Brazil will experience its greatest contemporary historical event. The Anarchist Congress, that will bring together groups from about 10 states across the country in debates, agreements and resolutions to act with common principles and tactics on the Brazilian reality, has a very special significance. Our conviction, in a more than 10 year process, says that militant anarchism holds indispensable contributions to the struggles for anti-capitalist social change. The meeting of militant forces that embody the same concept of work in co-ordination is a fundamental step in the journey of building political organisation that doesn’t just start now. [Português]

imageBrazil: Declaration by the 2nd Encounter of Especifista Anarchism in the Northeast Apr 19 0 comments

A further step forward in the advancement of Especifista Anarchism in northeastern Brazil has been made. Meeting in Recife, we sought to further the debate on Especifism and the structuring of political groupings in our region, with a view to strengthening and consolidating our movement. [Português]

imageFoundation of the Federação Anarquista de São Paulo (FASP) Nov 26 FASP 0 comments

The Federação Anarquista de São Paulo (FASP - Anarchist Federation of São Paulo) was founded on 18th November 2009! Though already in existence under the name Pro-FASP since early 2008, the organization was formally founded at an event last weekend that brought together FASP members together with delegates from the Federação Anarquista do Rio de Janeiro (FARJ). [Português] [Français][Italiano]

text"Socialismo Libertário", No. 17 May 06 FAO 1 comments

The April-June edition of "Socialismo Libertário", jointly published by the FAO groups, is now available.

textBrazil: "Socialismo Libertário", No.15 out now Jun 20 Forum for Organized Anarchism 0 comments

The journal "Socialismo Libertário" is published quarterly by the Fórum do Anarquismo Organizado (FAO - Forum of Organized Anarchism). The current issue is now available and can be downloaded in PDF format.

more >>
© 2005-2017 Anarkismo.net. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Anarkismo.net. [ Disclaimer | Privacy ]