Building an anarchist international
ireland / britain |
anarchist movement |
policy statement
Wednesday November 09, 2005 20:52
by National Conference - WSM

This is the WSM position paper on 'Building an anarchist international' agreed at the Oct 2005 WSM National Conference. Note the explicit reference to Anarkismo.net at the end
Building an anarchist international
1. Capitalism is an international system. It can not contain itself
within national borders. It is organised on an international basis.
This is seen in the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the
United Nations, the European Community, the North American Free Trade
Agreement and many other organisations and treaties. It is also seen
in co-operation between governments in the interests of capitalism as
a whole, or of a bloc within capitalism (e.g. the Gulf War).
2. To combat it anarchists need international organisation. There
can be no 'anarchism in one country'. Anarchists believe the only way
for a revolution to survive is to push it as far as possible. This
means not just within the geographical location the revolution
started in but internationally as well.
3.While a single country may be the first to move to anarchism it
will not be able to survive for long if it remains isolated. The idea
of socialism in one country as applied to Ireland would be laughable.
The ruling class, both native and foreign, are not democrats who will
stand by and allow people to take control of their own lives. They
will not only object to losing profits but will also fear the living
example of anarchism in action. Trade boycotts, embargos on supplying
raw materials, economic sabotage, sealing of borders and outright war
will be their answer. An isolated revolution will eventually
degenerate both economically due to isolation and politically. The
success of anarchism is dependant on it spreading across borders.
4.We aim to form an anarchist international of organisations that
hold the same political positions as ourselves. An international
where resources can be freely transferred between the constituent
organisations. This is a major task but it is vital to making an
international revolution.
5. Such an organisation would have agreed policies on major issues
such as the role of anarchist organisations, activity within the
trade unions and relations with the syndicalists, how to combat
racism and fascism, the type of struggle needed to advance the
movement for womens' freedom, anti-imperialist conflicts. It would
also have an agreed international strategy, the capability of
fostering international debate among anarchists and the capability of
giving aid to weaker sections or to those engaged in mass struggle.
6. Such an international organisation is more than a loose network
of like-minded groups. It is not a paper body. It only has a purpose
if it can contribute to the anarchist movement. Therefore it only
becomes real when based on a number of sizable organisations.
Anything less would need finance, administration, translation,
publications, and conferences but would not be capable of making the
return necessary to justify this expenditure of resources.
7. In order to reach a situation where an international
anarchist-communist organisation can be formed we must start
preparing the way now. Our tasks are to:
(1) Establish and maintain contact with other
anarchist-communist groups, and tendencies within other organisations
moving in the direction of our politics.
(2) Making the politics of both the Workers Solidarity Movement
and the 'Platformist' tradition more widely known within the
anarchist movement abroad.
(3) Take part in debates within the international anarchist
movement with an aim of explaining the policies of the Workers
Solidarity Movement, and of getting the various groupings to
clarify their political positions. In particular these are the need
for theoretical and tactical unity, imperialism and trade unions.
(4) Proposing concrete international co-operation on specific
issues where there is agreement between ourselves and other
organisations.
8. As we grow we will set up working groups on each country that
has an organisation we are in contact with. These groups will be
responsible for co-ordinating activity directed at these groups,
translating their material and preparing regular reports for
conferences and IB's. The international secretary will co-ordinate
such work.
9. We will maintain an international solidarity fund to aid
anarchist and libertarian communist groups in '3rd world' countries.
It will be funded from 5% of members subs, 25% of publication profits
and fund-raising activities. Donations of 10% or less of this fund
shall be decided on by the International Secretary. Donations above
this amount shall be decided on by Delegate Council
Short term section
S1. At a moment we have and will continue to maintain paper
exchanges with class struggle anarchists groups around the world.
this is a good point to start from but it is not enough.
S2 We will maintain contact with all members who emigrate and
encourage them to keep in contact for us.
S3. As none of the current anarchist groups in Britain are moving
in our direction or seem likely do so in the future we should have a
medium term objective of encouraging contacts in Britain towards
setting up an organisation along similar lines to ourselves. When
resources permit, this will involve producing a bulletin for Britain
and organising meetings over there..
S4. The WSM is in agreement with the Editorial statement of
Anarkismo.net which developed out of a previous initiative we took
with the South African WSF. The WSM will have a delegate on the
Anarkismo.net editorial group who will also be responsible for making
sure all relevant WSM material appears on the site. We will
contribute 5 euro per member per year to Anarkismo.net from out
international solidarity fund.
[Oct 2005 - to be confirmed by Nov 2005 Delegate council meeting]
What is a position
paper and more WSM position papers
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (4 of 4)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4This postion paper is in Italian at
I am concerned with the way that "politics" is being used in the defining characteristics of an international organization of anarcho-communist collectives. One of the most critical factors to anarchist social organizations is that it refrains from popular notions of political struggle. From my understanding, political struggle is of no use to anarchists because for the most part our struggles are socio-economic in origin and practice. Engaging in political struggle is a parliamentary socialist (Marxian-impossibilist) praxis that defines the contending and conflictual relationships within society as a method for the peasant/worker/proletarian collective conscience and insurrectionary action to bequeath political power from the beourgeosie and capitalist classes. Anarchist working class struggle is rooted in the provocation of a social revolution that brings about the disintegration of classes and establishes an apolitical social theory of direct democracy, mutual aid, voluntary association, etc. which repudiates the hierarchical notion of bureaucratic and representative leadership altogether. So, I am struggling with this idea of "sharing politics" among international anarchist organizations. Is our efforts, essentially,a "political" or a "socio-economic" struggle? Isn't the outcome of the First International an example of how anarchists refuted the idea of political struggle and engaging in political discourse to encourage a working class revolution?
In solidarity,
blackgadfly
The anarchist movement in the late 19th and early 20th century did use politics to mean parliamentary politics. However they also called themselves vanguardists and talked of building anarchist parties.
In particular when communicating across the globe it is important to realise that words can mean somewhat different things in different times and places. Discussion that are based on 'this word means blah blah blah' are therefore pretty fruitless and are often a failure of communication. All the more so when you consider many of the articles on this site are translations from on language to another by volunteers.
Rather than addressing the concepts in this paper your worrying about the exact words used. This is pretty pointless as the WSM obviously don't use 'politics' in the way you define it. You'd be better off addressing the concepts.
I did not mean to stress importance on the semantics of "this word means blah, blah, blah", rather, I wanted to find out precisely what was meant by the term "sharing politics"-- because within the historical trajectory of socialism the two contending camps of authoritarian and libertarian socialists have never come to agreement on what class struggle is essentially about (whether politico-economic or socio-economic), and that this is a basis for the division among class struggle socialists and class struggle anarchists. I'm not sure why you responded in the manner that you did, when all I was attempting to do is establish some clarity on the concepts and context in which WSM uses the term "sharing politics" Also, the concepts constructed in this article is nothing new to international anarcho-communist organization. In fact, much of it is modeled after the original "Platform" introduced by disillusioned "workers cause" revolutionaries following the Bolshevik take-over of the 1917 Russian revolution. Are there any new contributions to be shared that would introduce a tactical construction on how we plan to reorganize the capitalist dominated international political economy once the abolition of the wage system, capitalism, the state and all other social and cultural hierarchies has taken place? These are the concepts that should be debated upon in deliberative discourse, not the reiteration of concepts decided upon nearly a century ago!!
Respectfully,
blackgadfly