preferenze utente

cerca nell'archivio del sito Cerca cerca nell'archivio del sito


Search comments

ricerca avanzata

Nuovi eventi

International

nessun evento segnalato nell'ultima settimana

Prossimi eventi

International | Anarchist movement

nessun evento corrispondente!

Statement from Anarkismo on the AK Press accusations against Michael Schmidt

category international | anarchist movement | feature author mercoledì settembre 30, 2015 05:09author by Anarkismo Network Segnalare questo messaggio alla redazione

featured image
The Anarkismo Network

The international Anarkismo Network, which brings together class struggle anarchist organisations from more than a dozen countries in both the global South and North, and has relations with far more from across the globe, has noted with great surprise and concern the recent accusations by AK Press that Michael Schmidt is a fascist working undercover to infiltrate the anarchist movement.

Before we can make any pronouncements on the matter, however, we need to carefully examine both the AK Press evidence, the article by Alexander Reid Ross, as well as Michael Schmidt’s response to the evidence and article. As a network Anarkismo has not taken sides, and will not accuse the accuser or the accused before there is more information and all the evidence has been presented.

[Italiano]


Statement from Anarkismo on the AK Press accusations against Michael Schmidt


The international Anarkismo Network, which brings together class struggle anarchist organisations from more than a dozen countries in both the global South and North, and has relations with far more from across the globe, has noted with great surprise and concern the recent accusations by AK Press that Michael Schmidt is a fascist working undercover to infiltrate the anarchist movement [1].

Michael Schmidt has been a regular and long-standing contributor to Anarkismo.net and, in the past, has sat on its editorial and delegates groups. If these accusations are proven to be true Anarkismo will take immediate and appropriate action to ban him from posting on the website, as well as to guard against any possible future infiltration.

Before we can make any pronouncements on the matter, however, we need to carefully examine both the AK Press evidence, the article by Alexander Reid Ross, as well as Michael Schmidt’s response to the evidence and article. As a network Anarkismo has not taken sides, and will not accuse the accuser or the accused before there is more information and all the evidence has been presented. Both sides will have to explain themselves thoroughly first and be available for answering any serious questions about the information.

However, we must be clear that we feel the way in which AK Press has dealt with the matter is irresponsible and prejudicial, judging and condemning Michael Schmidt without presenting any evidence, and without allowing him the right to defend himself, or to respond to the article before making the public announcement of 25 September 2015.

Both sides must be given a fair chance to have their say.

The Anarkismo Network therefore demands that the alleged “incontrovertible evidence” be released by AK Press with immediate effect, and not to refer us to the journalist: since AK Press itself has endorsed the position, it must take responsibility for the proof.

We furthermore demand that AK Press unconditionally and explicitly state, also with immediate effect, that its allegations refer to Michael Schmidt alone, and not to any publishers, co-authors, editors, left organisations or currents with which Michael Schmidt may have been associated.

We urge AK Press to publish Michael Schmidt’s official responses on its newswires and sites, as we believe that he has the right to defend himself [2].

The Anarkismo Network


1. http://www.anarchistnews.org/content/michael-schmidt-author-black-flame-white-nationalist-trying-infiltrate-anarchist-movement-ak

2. https://www.facebook.com/AKPress/posts/10156169461510249

author by Mikey Dredd - West Yorkshire Anarchists (FB page admin)publication date mer set 30, 2015 19:29author email mikeydredd at blueyonder dot co dot ukauthor address 1 Wellstone Riseauthor phone 01132191950Segnalare questo messaggio alla redazione

I totally agree with the anarkismo statement and would call on AK Press to now publish / provide the evidence. Michael Scmidt has also responded so the onus is now on his accusers to prove their case or withdraw the accusation asap. The quicker the better, this is extremely damaging to both the movement and Michael himself.
In solidarity
MD

Link esterno: https://www.facebook.com/West-Yorkshire-Anarchists-764557220281483/timeline/
author by Syndicalist - Personal capacity onlypublication date gio ott 01, 2015 08:47author address author phone Segnalare questo messaggio alla redazione

Although I may not share in the politics or traditions of the Anarkismo network, I'd like to reiterate my viewpoint here. Whatever the ultimate outcome might be, as an anarchist, my own allegiance is to openness, fairness, libertarian integrity and principle.

In this spirit, I agree with this portion of your statement:

Before we can make any pronouncements on the matter, however, we need to carefully examine both the AK Press evidence, the article by Alexander Reid Ross, as well as Michael Schmidt’s response to the evidence and article. As a network Anarkismo has not taken sides, and will not accuse the accuser or the accused before there is more information and all the evidence has been presented. Both sides will have to explain themselves thoroughly first and be available for answering any serious questions about the information


author by Apublication date sab ott 17, 2015 23:36author address author phone Segnalare questo messaggio alla redazione

Read the full Schmidt story with all details here:

https://medium.com/@rossstephens/

author by Anarkismo supporterpublication date dom ott 18, 2015 10:18author address author phone Segnalare questo messaggio alla redazione

I see from link above 3 of 4 statements by the authors who make the claims is now online. But also, let us wait and see what Michael Schmidt does say in response. Then comrades can make an informed view. For now we only have ONE side. But that does not settle the issue.

author by Again with the delayspublication date mar ott 20, 2015 21:41author address author phone Segnalare questo messaggio alla redazione

So, this saga keeps dragging out. Nothing since Friday night, although the others came out every 2 days...

author by Platformismopublication date mer ott 21, 2015 11:40author address author phone Segnalare questo messaggio alla redazione

So Schmidt was able to post white supremacist leaning articles here on anarkismo:

https://medium.com/@rossstephens/about-schmidt-how-a-white-nationalist-seduced-anarchists-around-the-world-chapter-3-7d288d84b170#.fumxic11a

author by selim nashinpublication date gio ott 22, 2015 20:37author email author address sydny, austreliaauthor phone Segnalare questo messaggio alla redazione

our cigerate is better quality in australia.to know more visit the link.

Link esterno: http://www.finecigars.com.au/
author by Syndicalist (per cap only)publication date gio nov 05, 2015 02:02author address author phone Segnalare questo messaggio alla redazione

I gather the authors of the critical report of MS is now complete. I am wondering if and when replies by ZACF, Anarkismo and MS might appear?

author by Readerpublication date ven nov 06, 2015 21:34author address author phone Segnalare questo messaggio alla redazione

The statement says "Before we can make any pronouncements on the matter, however, we need to carefully examine both the AK Press evidence, the article by Alexander Reid Ross, as well as Michael Schmidt’s response to the evidence and article"

Schmidt has not yet responded but has indicated he is working on a response. It would be quite unreasonable of organisations to put forward positions after only hearing one side of the story. There has been more than enough of that already.

author by Syndicalist (per cap only)publication date sab nov 07, 2015 06:24author address author phone Segnalare questo messaggio alla redazione

Yes, just saw this morning that MS said he would issue a reply. Fair enough. I think there are many of us who want everything on the table so we can come to a determination of our own. And so we can all move on from this unsightly situation.

author by Kieran - Anarchist Affinitypublication date lun nov 09, 2015 15:42author email kieran at anarchistaffinity dot orgauthor address author phone Segnalare questo messaggio alla redazione

The following motion was adopted at Anarchist Affinity’s general meeting of 31 October 2015:

As a group we’ve read the recent series of articles by Alexander Ross and Joshua Stephens with substantial shock and concern.

Michael Schmidt is an author we have read, hosted in public events, and published in our magazine. The documents and information published by Ross and Stephens demonstrate that Schmidt has argued for and advanced deeply racist and white supremacist politics since at least 2006.

The explanations offered by Schmidt have been seriously unconvincing. The argument advanced by Schmidt that his racism on Stormfront and elsewhere was part of an undercover investigation (undertaken for eight years without result) stretches credulity. Even were this explanation accepted, the internal correspondence by Schmidt, that Ross and Stephens have published, demonstrates deeply unacceptable racism.

Whilst there have been reasonable objections to the manner in which the Schmidt material was announced and published; these are significantly less important than dealing with the problem that a prominent anarchist author, someone many in our tradition (including Anarchist Affinity) have drawn on, has concealed deeply racist views and practice for a number of years.

As a group, Anarchist Affinity has decided to cut ties with Michael Schmidt, and to remove works by Schmidt from our website.


I look forward to reading any statement that Lucien Van der Walt or the comrades of the ZACF might put out.

Link esterno: http://www.anarchistaffinity.org/2015/11/motion-regarding-michael-schmidt/
author by hmpublication date dom nov 15, 2015 13:07author address author phone Segnalare questo messaggio alla redazione

OK, it's November 15, and there's still nothing here at all from Anarkismo, even though all the evidence has been out for a while. Surely you can find it within yourselves to take a stand about this?

author by Readerpublication date lun nov 16, 2015 04:36author address author phone Segnalare questo messaggio alla redazione

I suspect they are waiting for Schmidt's reply which seems reasonable. All the evidence in a court case would be prosecution and defence, not just prosecution. How long did it take from the AK accusation being published until the last of those dramatic essays? A minimum waiting time would be the same I suppose? And then time to hear from ZACF and other 'witnesses'.

The mess is down to the very poor way AK and the writers of the essays handled this. If done properly none of this would have been public until all the evidence was available. The accusation first, evidence later approach was bound to lead to a drawn out process.

author by hmpublication date lun nov 16, 2015 07:51author address author phone Segnalare questo messaggio alla redazione

Dear Reader, your second paragraph doesn't follow from your first.

Also, the mess is the consequence of Schmidt's behavior, not anything that AK Press or the authors of the exposé are responsible for. The format of the text they wrote is more self-important than necessary, but we should not be complaining about that--we should be critical of the fact that no one else spoke up about this issue before they did, out of all the people who could have said something. If there is any possible defense of Schmidt's behavior, it is certainly not silence, which is what the people around him opted for across the course of several years.

I agree with the Anarchist Affinity statement, and I will be surprised if Schmidt's next statement, or anything we hear from Anarkismo after their long silence, can be anything but more damning of them both.

Anarchism is critical to the survival of humanity at this historical juncture, and deserves better exponents than we are seeing here.

author by Interlocutorpublication date sab nov 28, 2015 03:55author address author phone Segnalare questo messaggio alla redazione

Michael Schmidt's refutation: http://drinkingwithghosts.blogspot.co.za/

author by Syndicalist - Personal capacitypublication date gio dic 03, 2015 09:13author address author phone Segnalare questo messaggio alla redazione

Now that MS has issued his reply, can we anticipate hearing from LvdW, as well as the ZACF?

author by waitingpublication date dom dic 27, 2015 18:31author address author phone Segnalare questo messaggio alla redazione

OK, so still nothing from Anarkismo? Schmidt's autobiography came out, and then his critics published a refutation of that, so... Are you really taking no position on this whatsoever?

author by catstevenpublication date gio dic 31, 2015 13:48author address author phone Segnalare questo messaggio alla redazione

Micheal Schmidt is an apologist for RKAS.
Micheal Schmidtcries out against blacks rising up against white farmers and supports a “proper Boerestaat" ie a state that caters to white folks in South Africa and while doing so has written articles that paint racist radical pro-apartheid groups in a positive light while only shit talking the moderate ones.
He also hasn't given any good explanation of his covert Nazi-friendly persona.

author by Johnny - anarkismo editorial collectivepublication date mar gen 05, 2016 09:43author address author phone Segnalare questo messaggio alla redazione

I speak here as individual, this is not a collective statement. I will not comment on the thread...
I would only make this remark. Anarkismo is a network of 20 organisations. among these 20 organisations, only 7 are english-speaking orgs. All material published in accusation or defense of schmidt has been in english, and that's a lot of text. you understand now the problem we actually face if we want, and we will, to maintain the democratic framework we have inside the network.
that's all
greetings
johnny

Numero di commenti per pagina
  
 
This page can be viewed in
English Italiano Deutsch
© 2001-2020 Anarkismo.net. Salvo indicazioni diversi da parte dell'autore di un articolo, tutto il contenuto del sito può essere liberamente utilizzato per fini non commerciali sulla rete ed altrove. Le opinioni espresse negli articoli sono quelle dei contributori degli articoli e non sono necessariamente condivise da Anarkismo.net. [ Disclaimer | Privacy ]