user preferences

New Events


no event posted in the last week

Considerations of the Anarkismo network about the accusations against Michael Schmidt

category international | anarchist movement | press release author Saturday January 30, 2016 19:31author by Anarkismo network Report this post to the editors

The Anarkismo network has already published a statement that it would wait until all parts of the accusations by Reid Ross and Stephens were published, as well as the answers of M. Schmidt, before making any judgements on the case. Now that this has been forthcoming, as well as two more responses by Reid Ross, we are issuing a second statement to make public our intentions regarding the present situation.
The Anarkismo network
The Anarkismo network

It is difficult for us to draw definitive conclusions about this case based on the evidence provided so far by both sides. This is because to do so would require translating all the material, accusations and defence, into numerous languages in order to allow debate in each organisation, with organisations then debating each other through their delegates to the Anarkismo network. This is impossible to carry out with our current capacity – especially for organisations with daily militancy and work of social insertion and/or operating under difficult social contexts – without sacrificing other daily activities. However, the accusations against Schmidt are extremely serious and we take the issue of fighting racism and white supremacy as high priority. Therefore, the Anarkismo network has decided to call for a commission of enquiry to investigate more closely both the accusations and the defence, and to make recommendations to the broader anarchist movement based on their findings. As it is well known that Schmidt was a former militant in one of our member organizations and both helped to found and contributed extensively to the website, it is our intention that the commission should include members of other tendencies and non-affiliated anarchists in order to avoid partiality.

We have already stated in our previous statement how we feel about the methods of the accusers. Further than the specific case of M. Schmidt, those methods raised an internal debate about how we deal with such situations. The accusations may be true or not: this will be for the commission to settle. We cannot ignore that the methods used by the accusers – especially the lack of a criteria for minimum of justice – could be used one day in an unjustified accusation against any one of us in order to defame a militant, an organisation or a whole movement. As political organizations we have a duty to protect our members. While Schmidt may not be a member of any of our affiliated organisations, the way we deal with the current situation will have consequences for similar situations in the future.

This is why the Anarkismo network, before sending an invitation to members of other tendencies to join the commission of enquiry, will now work internally to figure out the commission's composition, the parameters of what decisions are within its range and on the questions of how we define justice and ethics in a way that does not reproduce the modus operandi of mainstream society. This is in order to propose a methodological and ethical framework for this commission (which, then, will need to be discussed with the tendencies we wish to invite to form the commission). We think this is necessary because, if this commission has no clear criteria, it will end up adopting, as a result of a dynamic of social pressure, those of the movement in general. And unfortunately, we cannot say that the criteria of ethics and justice today in our milieu are the best.

This work will take us a while. Not only because it is a vast discussion, but also because we lack the capacity to deal properly with this case without stopping our daily work.

There will be a further communication when the Anarkismo network is ready to make a formal proposal.

The Anarkismo Network
January 2016

 #   Title   Author   Date 
 23   Claims that ARR/JS are Eurocentric, Racist, American and therefore biased, have no merit     George    Sat Feb 20, 2016 05:25 
 22   Black lives matter... but only the white are allowed to speak!     J    Fri Feb 19, 2016 17:49 
 21   Message to "J"     BlackLivesMatter    Thu Feb 18, 2016 08:57 
 20   Past time for the idle     J    Tue Feb 16, 2016 01:16 
 19   #BlackLivesMatter Lucien van der Walt     BlackLivesMatter    Sun Feb 14, 2016 00:55 
 18   humble pie response appreciated, still some misconceptions     Liza    Sat Feb 13, 2016 00:40 
 17   summary and recommendations, no need for commission     jason    Fri Feb 12, 2016 23:54 
 16   Personal statement on the Michael Schmidt affair: Lucien van der Walt, 11 February 2016     Lucien van der Walt    Fri Feb 12, 2016 14:05 
 15   Red.Black.Writings     Lucien van der Walt    Fri Feb 12, 2016 14:02 
 14   In support of a commission     Adam W.    Thu Feb 11, 2016 03:50 
 13   Schmidt's Scythian tattoos     Schythian chieftan    Wed Feb 10, 2016 00:20 
 12   Disappointed in reply     mitch    Sat Feb 06, 2016 08:19 
 11   Calm down     George    Tue Feb 02, 2016 02:30 
 10   Why is this not on A-Infos like other articles?     Cooperativa    Tue Feb 02, 2016 02:22 
   Release the rejected Schmidt article submissions!     Waiting For Godot?    Tue Feb 02, 2016 02:14 
   LVDW = RedBlackWritings     Théoden    Tue Feb 02, 2016 00:09 
   What's this now?     Kittens    Tue Feb 02, 2016 00:05 
   Schmidt is a VIOLENT RACIST     BlackLivesMatter    Mon Feb 01, 2016 23:36 
   quick edit     terrible    Sun Jan 31, 2016 05:00 
   Shameful     terrible    Sun Jan 31, 2016 04:55 
   Please don't waste Noam's time on this     anon    Sun Jan 31, 2016 02:04 
   Here's a small portion of the evidence, for "the commission" to chew on     William Everard    Sun Jan 31, 2016 01:48 
   Second Anarkismo Schmidt response     Ronald G. Linville    Sun Jan 31, 2016 00:16 

Number of comments per page
This page can be viewed in
English Italiano Deutsch
George Floyd: one death too many in the “land of the free”
© 2005-2020 Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by [ Disclaimer | Privacy ]